[didier <dgautheron@xxxxxxxx>]

Guy Harris wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 05:56:04PM +0000, didier wrote:
> I suspect the main side-effect would be that the port number wouldn't
> show up in the "Source" or "Destination" columns of the display, but
> would show up in source port or destination port columns (if you add
> support in the "col_set_port()" routine in "epan/column-utils.c" - which
> you should do).
>
> It sounds as if that would be a feature rather than a bug.
>
> As part of this, you'd have to change "struct atalk_ddp_addr" not to
> have a "port" member, and change "atalk_addr_to_str()" to leave out the
> port number.
I add col_set_addr() too.

I'm using ddp.src ddp.dst (same naming convention as ip, ipx) but 
ddp.src.xxx exist too. Is it ok or should I use another name?
side note : there's no ipx.src field.

Attachment: atalk.diff.gz
Description: application/gzip