[Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 06:11:19PM -0800, Guy Harris wrote:
> I haven't checked in the other changes.  I don't want to check in a
> change to the top-level configuration file until
> 
> 	1) the gtk directory has been cleaned up

I'm about 80% done doing that but decided that I was wasting time:
each and every unused variable in gtk/*.c is needed in order to make
some callback function happy - so what I was doing was to just add
_U_s, lots of them and decided to write a small script for that. I
hope I'll get a patch done this sunday.

> and
> 
> 	2) the dissectors have been cleaned up

My idea goes a bit differently: After the rest is done, turn on the
warnings and wait for 4 weeks so that anyone who wants to properly
fix it will have a chance to do so, after that I'd provide a (semi-
autogenerated) patch for all files that generate warnings and don't
contain at least one _U_ anywhere. Does this sound ok?

> but I'll look at checking in at least some of the other changes.

Fine.

  Ciao
           Jï¿œrg

--
Joerg Mayer                                          <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
I found out that "pro" means "instead of" (as in proconsul). Now I know
what proactive means.