On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 01:38:49AM -0500, Adam wrote:
> does it look cool ? it is against current cvs tree.
Yes. Checked in.
> http://www.eax.com The Supreme Headquarters of the 32 bit registers
(An offtopic note:
"AFAIK, there's no uniform naming for 64 bit registers (any registers
for that matter) on 64 bit architecture."
There isn't one for 32-bit architectures, either; only IA-32 uses names
such as EAX. 32-bit MIPS, 32-bit SPARC, 32-bit PA-RISC, 32-bit members
of the POWER family, 32-bit System/3x0, ARM, VAX, etc. use different
names.
There won't be one for 64-bit architectures, either; 64-bit versions of
the ones I marked with "32-bit" (although "32-bit System/3x0" is called
"z/Architecture") use different names, and there's also x86-64....
Intel may make the most 32-bit chips that go into general-purpose
computers, but they're not the only maker of same, and a lot of 32-bit
chips go into embedded systems; they're not the only maker of 64-bit
chips that go into general-purpose computers, either.)
> This patch adds more defintions as to what sort of
> Attribute Value-Paris radiusd support.
It also makes RD_TP_CONNECT_INFO a RADIUS_STRING rather than a
RADIUS_STRING_TAGGED:
> @@ -486,7 +497,16 @@
...
> -{ RD_TP_CONNECT_INFO, RADIUS_STRING_TAGGED},
...
> +{ RD_TP_CONNECT_INFO, RADIUS_STRING},
...
I assume it was supposed to do that.