[Gilbert Ramirez <gram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 15:26:45 Guy Harris wrote:
> > I don't like this use of hidden fields. Yes, the hf_ip_checksum_bad
> > field is not part of the packet, but it should still be shown in the
> > GUI protocol tree, so that users know that it exists and can be used
> > in a filter expression.
> 
> What about the use of the "ip.addr" hidden field?  You don't see
> "ip.addr" mentioned when you select the source or destination address,
> so you don't necessarily know you can filter on it.
> 
> Do we need some way to show hidden fields in general?

Yes, that would be a good option to have.

--gilbert