Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Where to find more protocols for ethereal

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: David Frascone <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 08:09:55 -0600
Hmmm . . . good point.  I wonder if it would be worth it to extend libpcap?
It might be easier to start a new capture library for USB/etc from scratch.

On Wednesday, 07 Nov 2001, Neulinger, Nathan wrote:
> Seems to me that the easiest way to get started on this would be the old
> idea of separating that capture mechanism from ethereal itself into a small
> external tool. You could then easily add capability for selecting from a
> variety of external capture tools.  (This also resolves some of the security
> issues with allowing non-root access to ethereal.)
> 
> The real problem though becomes the limitations of libpcap, since it is
> currently defining the encapsulations/media-types/etc. If ethereal were to
> do that itself, it would be easy enough to add a 'usb' encapsulation type.
> 
> -- Nathan
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Nathan Neulinger                       EMail:  nneul@xxxxxxx
> University of Missouri - Rolla         Phone: (573) 341-4841
> Computing Services                       Fax: (573) 341-4216
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ronnie Sahlberg [mailto:rsahlber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 4:08 AM
> > To: ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [Ethereal-dev] Where to find more protocols for ethereal
> > 
> > 
> > Hi again list,
> > 
> > Bored tonight so weird thoughts wanders into my mind.
> > I guess ethereal is soon running short of protocols to add to 
> > it so why not come up with something new that might give us 
> > lots of other new protocols to add.
> > 
> > I just thought, ethereal is basically just a tool to read 
> > packets and analyze and display the data it contains. 
> > Currently ethereal only reads packets from network devices. I 
> > cant see it impossible (in theory) to also include other 
> > types of packet interfaces/devices as say 
> > SCSI/USB/firewire/IDE etc. They are conceptually similar, you 
> > send/receive packets. This might actually be extremely useful.
> > 
> > If it was possible to access those interfaces (in promisc 
> > mode) in any way reasonable similar to netword devices 
> > wouldnt it be wild to capture packets on the USB interface? 
> > (might help the developers of linux/bsd usb drivers)
> > 
> > I cant see why not...
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ethereal-dev mailing list
> > Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ether> eal-dev
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev