Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Diameter Finally up to -07

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
From: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 13:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
> Doh.  Sorry.  Here it is :(

Checked in (with some changes - there's no need to cast "gint32" or
"guint32" variables to "long" or "unsigned long" and then print them
with "%l[doxu]"; Ethereal probably won't fit on machines where "int"s
aren't at least 32 bits).

It's using "gint64" and "guint64"; at least at one point, that didn't
work on SINIX (Siemens' UNIX), at least with the compiler Uwe Girlich
was using.  Is it no longer the case that there are platforms where you
don't have 64-bit integral data types with all the compilers people
would want to use, or should we try to come up with some way to support
them (e.g., displaying 64-bit quantities as raw strings of hex digits)?