Wireshark · Ethereal-dev: Re: [ethereal-dev] Re: [ethereal-users] Issues with Ethereal

Ethereal-dev: Re: [ethereal-dev] Re: [ethereal-users] Issues with Ethereal

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: Guy Harris <gharris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 23:34:45 -0700

On Sat, Aug 19, 2000 at 02:06:14AM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
> The following patch puts the control-field information first, followed
> by the DSAP and SSAP information; does that provide you with what you
> need?

Well, not having heard either a "yes" or a "no" to my question, it's
what I just checked in.

References:
- [ethereal-dev] Re: [ethereal-users] Issues with Ethereal
  - From: Guy Harris
- Re: [ethereal-dev] Re: [ethereal-users] Issues with Ethereal
  - From: Guy Harris

Prev by Date: Re: [ethereal-dev] Why are we doing a conversation_init in rescan_packets in file.c?
Next by Date: [ethereal-dev] Binding multiple ports to one dissector
Previous by thread: Re: [ethereal-dev] Re: [ethereal-users] Issues with Ethereal
Next by thread: [ethereal-dev] What about one dissector for multiple ports
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread