Ethereal-dev: Re: [ethereal-dev] ICMP Checksum

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: Joshua Krage <jkrage@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 18:50:35 -0400
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 03:21:07PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
> No.  We only check the IP checksum, right now; I have a patch to check

Well here is a vote that ICMP checksums receive some attention. :)


> > BTW, does anyone have a references to ICMP Address Mask request/reply
> > documentation?
> RFC 950, "Internet Standard Subnetting Procedure".

Thanks for the reference.  Stevens vol. I already covers the good points,
but the RFC is always good to read.

Are there any other references, especially ones that discuss
implementation of ICMP address mask request/response?  I'm looking at
a trace of some address mask pairs that are going /way/ beyond the
local subnet or related networks (specific /32 address, not the all
subnets broadcast), and I'm trying to understand why.  In the modern
networking world, address mask requests seem superfluous, and at the
least shouldn't extend very far beyond the local subnet.

But this isn't "Networking 204".